I saw you broke dropped gear into two parts (again). I'm curious why. To me it makes more sense to have all feats that are from monster drops in one place, it just seems confusing why is it weapons feats are under dropped category and necklace/token ones are under active (with necklace (dropped)). What was wrong with the old way? If you can make a case for the current one, I'll gladly accept, otherwise I feel like it makes more sense to use the grouping I made (everything that is dropped feat, is under the dropped category), and looks more neat too
I was just trying to make the same layout for all the classes :) It is the same for the hunter and wizard runes, priest had to be done yet.
But yes I can see what you mean by being it confusing for others. I'll switch it again, and I'll do the same for the other classes. Jennythebrave (talk) 07:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Btw I have resized your 2 images a bit, so all the images on the page are the same size.
I just put |45px at the end : [[File:lightningAggro.jpg|45px Jennythebrave (talk) 08:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Jenny! We were editing A Young Boy’s Cry at the same time! Hahaha
But now, there is too much pictures for this walkthrough! Can you please remove this: 40px or these:
Hey Jenny! Are there pics for Augmentation Runes in the wiki other than the Mastery runes an the couple of others? I'd like to create pages for all the Uncommon an Epic Stats, but the largest image I can create with what I know is about the size of a dime and has that new level thing on the top-left, ruining the aesthetic for something like a wiki page. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Math Fish (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Hoi What do you mean? The ones like on the warrior page: griffin strike?
You need larger pictures or?? Jennythebrave (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm looking for the missing Glyph runes (same size as the other runes currently on the Runes page is fine). I messaged Ivar in the forums to see if he would help with that. Math Fish (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Yep, contacting Ivar is the best thing to do :) Good luck :) Jennythebrave (talk) 14:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Pages for mounts
Are we going to start doing individual pages for each mount? Like this new one for Leaper? I'm hoping you say no.
LOL, sorry, it's been a while since I've needed to user talk... forgot about the comment place on the user page. Oh well, it's here now. :D
I'd say no, that will get us so many extra pages. I'll delete it today and will send a message to the player who wrote it Jennythebrave (talk) 10:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I’m Héctor, one of the Fandom Community Managers. I’m here to talk with you about the upcoming changes we will experiment on the wikis when the new UCX will be released. As a result, we’ll have to adapt the current content - mainly the design and implemented code - to ensure they’re compatible and operational.
Specifically talking, the UCX will mainly affect the Frontpage, the design (logo, background, favicon, themes), the CSS/JS used and some templates that should adapt their look to it. While the wiki will still be migrated some weeks later, I’m here to work alongside you to anticipate all the work regarding review, improvements and adaptation to the new skin.
If you agree, I’ll start soon, reviewing the mentioned elements and describing to you what work should be done. For the case of the design, I can work with the future version, that will be working once the wiki will be migrated. Regarding the frontpage, templates and the code, I can work and implement the changes now, to have them properly working both in the present and the future, but having all the changes done in advance.
- Hoi, can you contact Ivar at firstname.lastname@example.org - he is the design manager of this wiki. ty
- Jennythebrave (talk) 10:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello again! As we have announced in our new blog, the opt-in exploration is available to you now! You can basically take a look at the main areas of the wiki, but as I explained the main things you should keep into account are the frontpage, the tables and their style, and other templates like infoboxes and navboxes. All of this, always thinking about the option of switching between the light and dark theme and all the content should be readable and adapted to both at the same time. In addition, all the wikis have to create a combination of colors for the light and dark theme, using the ThemeDesigner tool, and also re-upload the logo and favicon, and optionally the background (but it will work differently as header background, so it’s up to you what we’ll do with it on your wiki).
I already adapted the content and code to be compatible with FandomDesktop (the new skin), and also created the 2 themes and re-uploaded the assets. You can perfectly make any change to the ThemeDesigner and/or the Mediawiki pages, but I really encourage you to talk with me first. I’ve been adapting it, and I put some concrete stuff (colors in the ThemeDesigner, code in the MW pages and in one page but not another) for concrete reasons (basically to have all compatible with both themes), so to be more practical I think it’s better if we discuss about any proposal/issue/preference you could find/want before make changes. Thanks for everything! --CuBaN VeRcEttI (Contact) 21:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)